Index The meaning of the British Royal Arms Change in the Royal Arms in 1837 English potters use of the Arms  American potters - Royal Arms to National Symbols English potters use of 'American' Symbols  

 

 

English Potters incorporating American Symbols in their marks

“This is fine British ware, made specifically for you”

 

 

Use of American and British symbols 


English potters of the 19th century frequently incorporated a blend of British and American symbols into their marks, reflecting both tradition and commercial strategy. The lion and unicorn—long-established elements of the Royal Arms—signalled heritage, authority, and the perceived quality of British manufacture.

Key Symbols & Marketing Strategy -

To appeal directly to export markets, particularly in the United States, potters often combined these familiar British motifs with elements suggestive of American identity. Shields bearing stars, stripes, or vertical bars—reminiscent of the Great Seal—created a visual language that resonated with American consumers. The effect was deliberate: to present wares that were unmistakably British in origin, yet tailored to American taste and sentiment.

Historical Context - 

In the mid-to-late 19th century, the Staffordshire Potteries faced growing competition from an expanding American ceramics industry. In response, manufacturers adopted increasingly sophisticated marketing devices. 

The use of dual-national imagery can be seen as a subtle but effective strategy—conveying both the prestige of British craftsmanship and a sense of affinity with the American market. In essence, these marks communicated a simple message: this was quality British ware, produced with the American consumer in mind.


Using these dual-nationalistic symbols was a clever marketing tactic—essentially telling the buyer, “This is fine British ware, made specifically for you”

 

 



Ironstone China
J & G Meakin 

J & G Meakin » 

operated at Cannon Street 1851-1852


Ironstone China
J & G Meakin 


Lewis Henry
Meakin
»

operated at Cannon Street 1852-55

This specific mark was a strategic marketing tool designed for the American export market from the mid 19th century.

The crest is a hybrid coat of arms that blends British and American symbolism to appeal to U.S. buyers:

  • The Bird: A stylized bald eagle, representing the United States.

  • The shild representing the American stars and stripes.

  • The Lion & Unicorn: Traditional symbols from the British Royal Arms, used to evoke a sense of prestige and quality.

 

The fact that both J&G Meakin and Lewis H Meakin both used the same mark and that for a brief period the two companies operated at the same works Cannon Street works strengthens the assumption of their relationship as first cousins.  explore the Meakin family of potters »

  


John Meir & Son

Operated at Tunstall from 1837 to 1897 - John Meir & Son »

undated advert - c.1875-1885 (most likely) for John Meir & Son

The wording “Home, North and South American, Colonial and Continental Markets” together with “Shippers should send for samples and prices” reflects a well-established global trade network, not an emerging one

 

John Meir & Son used a wide range of backstamps on their ware - these four selected  marks trace a clear shift in emphasis from British identity to targeted export marketing.

  • The Royal Arms mark, paired with “Tunstall,” firmly asserts British origin and quality. The lion and unicorn signal tradition and authority, while the town name roots the wares in the Staffordshire Potteries.

  • A later mark replaces this with an eagle holding a ribbon bearing the pattern name. While not explicitly American, the eagle introduces a more universal symbol of strength and hints at growing awareness of overseas markets.

  • The next version adopts full American imagery: an eagle with shield of stars and stripes, olive branch and arrows, and the motto “E Pluribus Unum.” 
    This direct reference to the Great Seal leaves little doubt about the intended audience.

  • The final example shown is the Royal Arms with the addition of “ENGLAND” strongly suggesting a date after 1891, when U.S. import regulations required country-of-origin marking, placing this version among the firm’s later, export-focused wares.

Together, these marks show a progression from established British symbolism to deliberate American appeal—reflecting the increasing importance of the U.S. market and the need to align British-made wares with American identity.

 

 


Stone China
John Meir & Son
Tunstall 

I. M. & S.

E Pluribus Unum
Pearl White Ironstone
I. Meir & Son

Ironstone 
John Meir & Son
England 

This early mark combines the Royal Arms with the town name “Tunstall.” 
This reflects a firmly domestic identity, where quality is signalled through British royal symbolism and local origin within the Staffordshire Potteries. 
At this stage, branding is inward-looking: authority and tradition matter more than export differentiation.

The introduction of an eagle holding a ribbon marks a clear stylistic shift. 
While not explicitly American, the motif moves away from strictly British heraldic language toward more internationally recognisable symbolism. 
The inclusion of pattern names also reflects increasing standardisation and catalogue-driven export trade.
This phase corresponds with the period when Staffordshire firms were competing heavily in overseas markets through wholesalers and agents rather than domestic retail channels.

Targeted American appeal - this mark adopts full iconography of the United States Great Seal. 
This is no longer generic export symbolism but a deliberate alignment with American national identity.
The presence of stars and stripes, olive branch and arrows, and the motto “E Pluribus Unum” suggests a sophisticated marketing strategy: British manufacture presented in a form visually and culturally familiar to American consumers.

Where “ENGLAND” appears beneath the Royal Arms in a more formalised, standardised way, it is certainly post-1891 period following U.S. import labelling requirements. This represents not a new marketing direction, but a regulatory consolidation of an already established export practice.

 


 

 



Page History:

Page created 1 May 2026